Are we witnessing a trend that will take us back to 1998 when oil prices fell to $10/barrel? Speculating on oil prices movements is always a dangerous game but to many people (myself included) it's just too tempting to resist. So here's my bet: just as markets were overshooting at the beginning of the year and had so far separated themselves from the physical market fundamentals that $140/barrel not only seemed plausible, it was reasonable; so too are markets overshooting the downside risk now. Again, the market mentality seems stuck. Until the end of this summer, the market saw no downside risk to prices and prices just kept rising, even in the face of declining demand from the OECD. Market analysts (many of whom worked for firms that had ties to the trading side) prophesied that even though demand was being met now by adequate supply, soon the world would be short on oil because of growth from non-OECD countries. $140/barrel was completely justified. In November, the call is just the opposite: the world is in a deep recession and oil demand is not going to come back. This even though we still don't have a good handle on where Chinese demand (the big villain during the summer months) is currently. Chinese consumption has slowed but is still growing. And the effects of a Chinese stimulus package announced last week are still to be determined.
So where is the "fair" price for oil? Of course, it's anyone's guess but future contracts point to a range of $80-$85/barrel, suggesting that traders remain bullish on the long term outlook for the oil market. And, although I reject the notion of a "virtuous" price for oil, $80 seems a bit more reasonable for multiple agendas: low prices contributed to excessive consumption in the US. A long term sustainable price of $80 would help conservation, the development of energy alternatives, and the long term fiscal health of the oil producers. Convincing Wall Street of this is another story.
No comments:
Post a Comment